Monday | 7 October 2024 | Reg No- 06
বাংলা
   
Monday | 7 October 2024 | Epaper
BREAKING: ● Four die, 1225 patients hospitalised with dengue      ● 105 children killed in mass uprising      ● Saber Hossain Chowdhury arrested      ● 50,000 people marooned as over 100 villages flooded in Netrokona      ● Preliminary list of 735 martyrs killed in July-Aug mass uprising published      ● Mahmudur Rahman demands banning Chhatra League in a week      ● Israeli strike on mosque in Gaza kills 26      

Personal sharing at workplaces should be within limits

Published : Sunday, 11 February, 2024 at 12:00 AM  Count : 351
Md Saifullah Azad CIPA, CERM
In the realm of professional endeavors where individuals engage in work or business activities, the substantial portion of their day unfolds within the confines of the office, oftentimes eclipsing the hours spent within the sanctuary of their homes. Consequently, an intricate web of cordial relationships germinates among colleagues, fostering an environment conducive to collaborative efforts and mutual support. The significance of kindness among colleagues reverberates through myriad dimensions: it facilitates seamless cooperation, augments concentration levels, bolsters work efficiency, and cultivates a positive outlook towards the habitual pilgrimage to the office domain.

Nevertheless, as the venerable Chanakya astutely opined, the adage that "everything in excess is poison" resounds with profound wisdom. Even virtues, when pursued in surplus, may transmute into vices. Thus, while nurturing amicable bonds with office comrades is commendable, exercising prudence regarding the extent of disclosures becomes imperative for both professional advancement and inner tranquility.

Indeed, office colleagues exist within a peculiar stratum-akin to friends, yet distinct in essence. Within the confines of the workplace, camaraderie coexists with competition, rendering interpersonal dynamics susceptible to transformation with shifting circumstances. Hence, divulging grievances or discontentment to colleagues, as I once learned to my chagrin, may inadvertently catalyze unfavorable consequences. In my own regrettable misstep, I bemoaned a decision handed down by the upper echelons of office management to a colleague, only to discover months later that my sentiments had been relayed to the very authorities whose actions I contested. In retrospect, the error of my ways became starkly apparent; recourse to proper channels for addressing concerns and grievances is the hallmark of prudence and professionalism.

Thus, a paradigm shift ensued in my approach; henceforth, any disquietudes or dissatisfactions found expression solely through direct discourse with the designated authorities. The folly of seeking solace in the commiseration of colleagues, rather than confronting issues head-on, became glaringly evident. However, abstaining from confiding in colleagues does not preclude meaningful interactions; avenues for dialogue abound, encompassing discussions on work methodologies, skill enhancement strategies, and extracurricular interests. Commending exemplary conduct or noteworthy achievements among colleagues serves as a catalyst for stimulating discourse and fostering a culture of mutual appreciation.


Conversely, delving into discussions pertaining to salary, bonuses, or benefits epitomizes a quagmire best left untraversed at the individual level. Such deliberations oftentimes engender envy and acrimony, impeding the harmonious fabric of workplace relationships and casting aspersions upon ones professional integrity. Similarly, the propagation of unfounded rumors or malicious gossip constitutes an affront to ethical conduct, warranting swift repudiation and disengagement. Participating in the dissemination of baseless allegations not only perpetuates injustice but also compromises ones moral rectitude.

Moreover, navigating the conversational terrain fraught with topics such as politics, religion, or ideology necessitates a delicate balancing act. While articulating viewpoints is commendable, endeavoring to sway entrenched opinions risks precipitating discord and estrangement. Respecting the autonomy of individual perspectives mitigates the perils of contentious dialogue, thereby preserving the sanctity of collegial relationships.

While the demarcation between personal and professional spheres remains ostensibly discernible, inevitable permeations occur between the two domains. However, discretion dictates that not all facets of personal life warrant communal exposition. While extending solace in times of adversity is noble, delving into the intricacies of romantic entanglements, familial disputes, or financial woes encroaches upon realms best navigated by professionals versed in the respective domains.

Similarly, while discourse on health matters fosters a culture of care and concern, divulging intricate medical details within the precincts of the office encroaches upon the sanctity of privacy and confidentiality. Moreover, refraining from airing grievances regarding domestic discord or workplace dissension to colleagues exemplifies a precept grounded in prudence and discretion. Disseminating negative commentary or castigating colleagues behind their backs breeds distrust and animosity, corroding the very foundation of collegial camaraderie.

Moreover, the specter of past indiscretions looms large, warranting circumspection in matters of disclosure. Revelations of prior transgressions or lapses in judgment engender a climate of suspicion and distrust, potentially undermining ones professional credibility. Thus, the imperative of exercising restraint and discretion in matters of personal disclosure cannot be overstated.

Furthermore, cultivating a workplace culture characterized by mutual respect and decorum demands vigilance in matters of interpersonal conduct. Appreciating the aesthetic sensibilities or sartorial choices of colleagues necessitates a demeanor imbued with grace and refinement. Instances of casual innuendo or untoward remarks not only contravene the tenets of professionalism but also constitute acts of sexual harassment, warranting swift reprimand and disciplinary action.

Finally, the mosaic of interpersonal relations within the workplace is imbued with nuances and complexities necessitating judicious navigation. While fostering bonds of camaraderie and mutual support enriches the fabric of workplace dynamics, exercising discretion and restraint safeguards against the perils of overindulgence. Compassion, empathy, and respect serve as guiding beacons, illuminating pathways toward harmonious coexistence and professional fulfillment. Through a delicate interplay of restraint and engagement, the tapestry of collegial relationships attains a semblance of equilibrium, wherein camaraderie flourishes amidst the contours of mutual respect and decorum.

The author is a banker


LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
Dengue scourge taking a turn for worse
Our art market should expand 
Response to flood-hit areas must be well organised
Reintegration of our returnee migrants crucial  
Rising drug addiction throws our youths into jeopardy 
Repatriation of Rohingyas still not in sight 
Banking sector reforms and some proposals
Class struggles continue to widen
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: info©dailyobserverbd.com, news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝