Monday | 13 January 2025 | Reg No- 06
বাংলা
   
Monday | 13 January 2025 | Epaper

Are all people equal in the eye of law?

Published : Tuesday, 18 September, 2018 at 12:00 AM  Count : 701
Mahbubar Rahman
Mahbubar Rahman

Mahbubar Rahman

Lexicon defines law as body of enacted or customary rules recognized by a community as binding. It further elucidates law as the body of rules by which people live together in society. Laws are formulated in the parliament by the lawmakers in the democratic country and are enforced by government through police and courts. Community cannot live peacefully without the practice of law. Wherever more than one person is living, law is necessary for settling possible conflicts in the society.

Nature makes its own laws by natural phenomena for its right order, while humans make laws for their own civilized governance. No civilization ancient, medieval or modern could flourish without implication of laws in its characteristic features. In ancient time, wishes and words of kings were the laws. Later laws grew from decisions by courts and from books in which lawyers wrote what had been learned. The Romans were the great law makers. Roman laws gradually converted into English laws which are widely practiced in the world including Bangladesh. It is said that all are equal in the eyes of law in the civilized society irrespective of caste, creed, religion, colour, race etc. Is it so in reality? Critics say that law is made by the stronger people to punish and subjugate weaker segment of population particularly in underdeveloped or developing countries.

A sixth century BC Scythian prince Anacharsis said: "Written laws are like spider's webs; they will catch, it is true, the weak and poor, but would be torn in pieces by the rich and powerful." Jungle's rule still prevails in many countries of the underdeveloped world where civilized laws are either trampled under the jackboot of autocrats or does not at all exist.

Even in the countries of the developing world all people are seemingly not treated equally in the eye of law. With petty crimes and corruptions, weaker people are handed down heavy punishment, while the rich and stronger people with committing greater crimes and corruptions melt out through the loopholes of laws. These corrupt people with their money and muscle power rule supreme in the society and in many cases usurp the state power by military muscle or even by winning the support of the gullible people through tricks and machinations in democratic process. Crimes and corruptions are like peanut for them which they commit with a free license in hands under the cover of politics and cheep populist slogans.

With political muscle and power, crimes and corruptions go unabated in a country where different laws are in place, but their proper implications are of far cries. Mighty corrupt people with money and muscle indulging doing mockery with laws, hands of which are theoretically stretches long but; sadly in practice, is too short even to catch the long necks of criminals and corrupt people often walks in disguise in the corridors of laws. When the corrupt politicians seating in the opposition camp are duly apprehended and brought to justice through the process of laws, then they start clamouring with louder voices and say that they are the victims of political rivalry and vengeance perpetrated by the government and ruling party in power. With taking benefits of the certain provisions of law and its practices they subtly indulge in prolonging the dispensation of law for never ending time in order to evade punishments which otherwise they deserve without any doubt for their wrong doing.

With considerable trepidation and due regards I have to mention, at their point, that a corruption case of a very high profile politician with huge popularity who was supposed to be the custodian of peoples' trust, stretched long ten years before being disposed off in the recent past with a jail term, paints a dismal picture how a court case is delayed for such long time before being disposed off with a verdict, after buying time unduly on different pretexts through the loop holes of law. After the verdict was delivered with a jail term, there has been vociferous outcry painting the verdict as politically motivated.

Provisions of law say that even if the verdict of any case goes against the aggrieved person, then there is legal dispensation over the matter and the aggrieved person can go to the higher judiciaries through lodging appeal for justice. But before following the path of legal procedures, if a responsible (!) spokesman of an aggrieved political party, in a louder voice and vitriolic language with trenchant body language term the verdict as concocted and rejects it with hatred, then do not such abrasive utterances be classified as blatant contempt of court? Legal experts have, of course, the answer to this quarry.

 If laws are refined and extended form of humans' commonsense, then the commonsense tells us that such acerbic and contemptuous utterances are nothing but tantamount to clear contempt of court which is punishable by the provision of existing law. But unfortunately nothing happens to those high handed persons for making such contemptuous utterances because of the fact that such high handed persons wear political faces and wish to be treated differently from the rest of the citizens of the country.

Question further arises, if a political leader is convicted in a corruption case and lands in the prison, then does he/she still stay eligible for enjoying political impunity? In Bangladesh our 'jail code' ensures preferential treatment known as 'division' to all political leaders in prison irrespective of whether if these political leaders go behind the bar on purely political ground or on being convicted in major corruption cases or on being convicted on other ordinary criminal offences.

British law formulated 'jail code' making special provisions for political prisoners and other prisoners who are socially accomplished persons in their own domain and are regarded as the voice of the people considering their social status and positions in the public eyes. Question again arises whether prisoners facing incarceration on criminal offence or corruption case garbed in political outfits are still eligible to enjoy special facilities within the four wall of prison cell?

A political prisoner is someone imprisoned they have opposed or criticized the government responsible for their imprisonment. Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Bangbandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Moulana Bhasani, Nelson Mandela and many more iconic politicians of their likes to name were the political prisoners. They did not go to prison on any corruption charges. They were the voices of the people.

If a political figure not duly falling under the category of a defined political prisoner goes behind the bar on being convicted in corruption case, then is such prisoner eligible to enjoy such special facilities within the four walls of jail? If the answer to this question is negative, then it will be deemed that in the eye of law all are equal that we have been hearing this rhetoric for ages. If the answer to the above noted same question is affirmative, and then it is deemed that paradoxically all citizens are not equal in the eye of law.

In fine, all poor citizens of the Peoples' Republic wish to dream a golden deer and stay equal at least in the eye of law in a constitutionally 'egalitarian' and 'secular' State where equality of justice is supposed to prevail. Only God can help us.

The writer is a former Civil Servant


LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
Stop bloodshed in the war torn country
Will Kurds keep American weapons after Syria withdrawal?
Post Language Movement East Bengal and struggle for rights
Tribute to Comrade Moni Singh
Agriculture: An effective approach of improving condition of disabled people
The environment ready to arrange fair election?
International Monetary Fund: A heartbreaking story!
Political and election culture in Bangladesh
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: district@dailyobserverbd.com, news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝
close