Saturday | 5 October 2024 | Reg No- 06
বাংলা
   
Saturday | 5 October 2024 | Epaper
BREAKING: ● Sailor dies after oil tanker catches fire in Ctg      ● Ex-president Badruddoza Chowdhury passes away      ● Killing during students' movement: 9 bodies to be exhumed in Sylhet      ● Malaysian prime minister leaves Dhaka for home      ● CA seeks Malaysian support for Bangladesh to be ASEAN dialogue partner      ● Malaysian PM assures of attention to 18,000 Bangladesh workers       ● Bid to kill Khaleda Zia: Sheikh Hasina among 113 sued      

NATO as the Major Source of Military Threats for Russia

Published : Saturday, 13 July, 2024 at 12:00 AM  Count : 350
H.E. Mr Alexander Mantytskiy
On July 9-11, Washington will host a NATO summit marking the 75th anniversary of the Alliance. According to its organizers, it will be heldamid the alleged deterioration of European security. Representatives of 32 member statesand other invited countries and organizations will discussstronger measures aimed at inflicting "strategic defeat" on Russia through indirect actions, military support to Ukraine, and opportunities for NATO further advancement, including in Asia-Pacific.

Comprehensive deterrence of the USSR was the initial task of theNorth Atlantic Alliance. The Soviet Union dissolution did not alterNATO anti-Russian orientation.Despite the declared intention towards constructive cooperation with Moscow, the Alliance compromised Russias security through continued provocations, including eastward enlargement, by bringing military infrastructure closer to the Russian borders, and drawing post-Soviet states into its orbit. 

At the same time NATO leadership had to put a lot of effort to convince the member states that the organization was still relevant.The Kosovo crisis came in handy.NATO demonstrated that it was not just a political organization, but a functional military bloc, which can resolve matters of war and peace unilaterally, bypassing the UN Security Council. Then NATO fought terrorism in Afghanistan and carried out a "humanitarian" intervention in Libya. Then they promoted the idea of "global NATO", which came down to partnershipswithfew selected countries. But the Ukrainiancrisis has brought everything back on track, and the Alliance has resumed containing its oldand worthy enemy - Russia.

NATO started providing political, financial and military assistance to Kyiv long before the RussianSpecial Military Operation in Ukraine (SMO). In 1989, top US military officer Colin Powell said that if NATO opensits doors to new members tomorrow, theywouldreceive several applications within a week - perhaps even from Ukraine. Today, ahead of the NATO summit, Brussels says that though at the moment Ukraine will not become an Alliance member, Kiev will get a "bridge to that goal".

Moscows decisive actions to defend national interests in response to the Western-initiated coup in Ukraine in 2014 revealedthe Alliance true face. Brussels used the return of Crimea to Russia as an excuse for open confrontation. In theirdoctrinal documents, Russiahas become"a probable enemy". The NATO 2022 Strategic Concept defines Russia as "the most significant and direct threat". 

When the SMO began, the Allianceand their puppet Kiev regime have unleashed a full-scale "hybrid aggression" against Russia using diplomatic, information, and economic tools.The NATO member states provide financial and military assistance to Kiev, estimated at $132 billion, with the US shareof $63 billion. Since February 2022, Ukraine received 800 tanks; 3500 armored combat vehicles; 1500 artillery pieces; 270 multiple rocket launchers; 250 anti-aircraft missile systems; 7700 MANPADS; 290000 anti-tank weapons; 130 aircraft and helicopters; 30000 unmanned aerial vehicles.

The largest weapons shipments were sent in 2023 ahead of the counterattack of the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF), which was supposed to mark a turning point in the conflict and create conditions for negotiations on Kievs terms. However, the Russian army successfully grinded down the Western equipment.

Recently, NATO has started equipping the UAF with high-precision long-range weapons to destroy objects deep in the Russian territory. This is allegedly being done so that Kiev could launch an offensive before the US elections to demonstrate its ability to conduct active hostilities.

Zelenskys regime receives intelligence data from NATO satellites, radars, and reconnaissance aircrafts,while NATO countriesmercenaries participate in combat operations alongside the Ukrainian forces. If Brussels really intends to resolve the conflict inUkraine by political and diplomatic means, they would stop supplying it with weapons, intelligence and mercenaries.

NATO preparing for a large-scale war against Russia is another menace. What makes it even more disturbing is the number of member states having nuclear weapons and high-precision long distance weapons withthe US anti-missile defense system beingdeployedworldwide. The "no first use" obligationis missing in the US 2022 Nuclear Posture Review,which is justified by the reluctance to show weakness in the face of Russia and China with their great military capabilities.

NATO is also bolstering tactical nuclear weapons, including US tactical nuclear aerial bombs and aircraft squadrons. Around 200 items of special ammunition have already beendeployed in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Türkiye, while Poland and the Baltic countries stand for hosting American tactical nuclear weapons.

Amid the SMO, high intensity of NATO operational and combat training in Eastern Europe is a direct militarythreat to Russia. In 2023-2024, more than 40 majorexercises, including Steadfast Defender, were held near the Russian borders to practice employment of coalition formations in operations against Russia.

Brussels is building up other capabilities as well.In 2022, NATOannouncedits"Overarching Space Policy" with the near-Earth space as a new operational domain. At the same time, infrastructure for information, psychological and cyber operationsis being increasingly deployed along Russias borders.

While claiming to be a global guarantor of international security, NATO attemptstospread its influence beyond the Euro-Atlantic, particularly to tailor theestablished system of interstate interaction in Asia-Pacific to its own needs. Russia presumesthat "Indo-Pacific strategies"arein fact aimed at creating militaryandpolitical groupings under Washington and Brussels control. NATO forces mightbe fully integratedin the AUKUS structures. "AUKUS Plus"formatwith Japan and South Korea is beingwidelydiscussed. The ideaoftheUSA - Japan - South Korea triangle, considered as "Asian NATO", is being revived.

The number of military maneuvers in Asia Pacific isrising. Thelargest-everairexercisePacific Skies 24will be held byGermany, France and Spain inlateJulyon the Japanese Hokkaido island in the immediate proximity to the Russianborders. The USA and the Philippines expand Balikatan joint exercise aimed at containing "rivals in Asia Pacific".

NATO attempts to establish global dominance jeopardize the entire security architecture in Asia, undermine the authority of ASEAN and other regional organizations, create challenges fornon-proliferation. These activities pose a threat toeverycountryin the region, including Russia, and will not be left without response.

Evidently, NATO activities offer no positive agenda and do not contribute to peace and security. Instead, the USA and its European allies have been consistently destroying the system of international security. They have not reacted to any of Russias substantive initiatives. They rejected the adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty, shelved the proposed Treaty on European Security, did not discuss the draft Agreement on the Principles of Security Relations between the Member States of the NATO-Russia Council, and refused to provide guarantees that their air defense systems would not be directed against Russia. The Americans withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty under far-fetched pretexts, repeatedly violated the Treaty on Open Skies and then withdrew from it, and made it impossible to extend the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms with Russia.

To prevent further degradation of the European security caused by Western irresponsibility, on December 17, 2021,Russia proposed to sign a Treaty on Security Guarantees with the USA and the Agreement on Security Measures with NATO. These documents clearly set out legally binding provisions for security indivisibility: non-expansion of NATO, non-deployment of threatening weapons systems near our borders, moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles, returning the configuration of the Alliances forces to their 1997positions.

Indivisible security as the key principle determining behavior of states in the political-military sphere was essentially rejected by Washingtonand its allies. Our trajectory of further relations with European neighbors will be determined once the goals and tasks of the SMO are accomplished.

The writer is Ambassador of Russia to Bangladesh, on the topic of NATO global activities



LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
Is a full-scale war in Middle East imminent?  
How UN stays relevant by prolonging ME crisis
Unchanging value of literature in the age of algorithms
Teachers should focus on social justice in classrooms
Our fiscal transparency in the report of USA
Joviality in self exploration
The observance of the world teacher's day in the new light
Natural gas crisis in Bangladesh: Is LNG the only solution?
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: info©dailyobserverbd.com, news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝