Saturday | 11 January 2025 | Reg No- 06
বাংলা
   
Saturday | 11 January 2025 | Epaper

Great helmsman’s great deception

Published : Sunday, 22 December, 2024 at 12:00 AM  Count : 496
Sanjida Nourin Jhinuk
“What happens when revolution isn't just about ideology, but a quest for power?" Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution, launched in 1966, stands as a landmark in modern Chinese history, remembered for its profound socio-political impact. While officially described as a movement to purge capitalist elements and preserve communist ideology, the deeper motives behind it reveal a deliberate attempt by Mao to consolidate his waning authority within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). By cloaking his actions in revolutionary rhetoric, Mao transformed an ideological battle into a personal power struggle, manipulating the masses to maintain his grip on the CCP and the country.

The origins of the Cultural Revolution can be traced back to Mao's declining influence within the CCP following the disastrous Great Leap Forward (1958-1962), an initiative designed to modernize China's economy but which ended in widespread famine and failure. As criticism of Mao's leadership grew within party ranks, moderate leaders such as Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping gained prominence by promoting pragmatic economic policies. This shift away from Mao's radical vision posed a direct challenge to his authority. Mao, perceiving this as a betrayal of the revolutionary ideals that had defined the founding of the People's Republic of China, sought to reassert himself. The Cultural Revolution thus became his chosen weapon to eliminate rivals and restore his dominance under the guise of an ideological campaign.

One of the most striking features of the Cultural Revolution was Mao's ability to mobilize the youth, particularly through the formation of the Red Guards. This mass movement of students and young workers became the driving force of the revolution, carrying out Mao's directives with fervent zeal. They targeted teachers, intellectuals and party officials deemed "revisionist" or "bourgeois." The closure of schools and universities enabled the Red Guards to focus entirely on Mao's agenda, engaging in activities ranging from public humiliation and violence to the destruction of cultural artifacts. The emphasis on eradicating the "Four Olds"-old customs, culture, habits and ideas, provided a pretext for widespread chaos, with the destruction of historical sites and religious institutions serving as a symbolic rejection of China's pre-communist past.

Although Mao's rhetoric framed the revolution as an ideological cleansing, it is evident that his primary objective was the consolidation of power. The movement strategically undermined figures like Liu Shaoqi, who had gained significant influence by advocating policies that diverged from Mao's radical approach. Liu, labeled a "capitalist-roader," was removed from his position and subjected to public humiliation, ultimately dying in captivity. Deng Xiaoping, another moderate leader, was similarly purged, marking a clear pattern of eliminating political rivals under the cover of ideological purity. Mao's distrust of his own comrades, particularly after the criticism he faced at the Lushan Plenum in 1959, further underscores how the revolution was less about defending Marxist principles and more about securing personal dominance.

Mao's propaganda machine played a crucial role in shaping public perception of the Cultural Revolution. Through carefully crafted messages, Mao positioned himself as the "great helmsman" of the communist cause, a leader whose vision was indispensable to the nation's progress. Posters, slogans and public rallies glorified Mao's leadership, creating a cult of personality that overshadowed the failures of his previous policies. This manipulation of mass sentiment allowed Mao to redirect the anger of the populace away from himself and toward his political enemies, further consolidating his control.

The ideological aspect of the Cultural Revolution, while not entirely absent, served as a secondary and often superficial layer to its primary objective. Mao's call for a "revolutionary struggle against the bourgeoisie" and the emphasis on Marxist-Leninist principles were largely tools to rally public support. In reality, the revolution disrupted the very foundations of communist governance, with party officials and intellectuals-key proponents of the ideology becoming its main victims. The resulting chaos, characterized by factional violence and civil unrest, highlighted the extent to which the movement deviated from genuine ideological aims. For Mao, the ideological fervor was a means to an end, a convenient facade for a campaign driven by personal ambition.

The human cost of the Cultural Revolution was staggering. Estimates suggest that between half a million and two million people lost their lives, many of them victims of public purges and mass violence orchestrated by the Red Guards. Teachers, intellectuals and perceived counter-revolutionaries were tortured, driven to suicide, or executed, their deaths often justified by flimsy accusations of ideological impurity. The destruction extended to China's cultural heritage, with countless historical artifacts and sites destroyed in the name of revolutionary progress. This widespread devastation underscores the brutal lengths to which Mao was willing to go to maintain his authority.

The consequences of the Cultural Revolution extended far beyond the immediate period of upheaval. Economically, the disruption of education and industry left lasting scars, hindering China's development for years to come. Socially, the movement created deep divisions within families and communities, as individuals were encouraged to denounce loved ones in the name of ideological loyalty. Politically, the CCP itself was destabilized, with many of its most capable leaders purged during the revolution. Although Mao succeeded in consolidating his power, the cost was immense, leaving China in a state of disarray that would take decades to recover from.

In retrospect, the Cultural Revolution stands as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked power. While it was presented as a movement to safeguard communist ideals, its underlying motives were deeply personal. Mao's ability to manipulate ideology for political gain highlights the vulnerability of revolutionary movements to the ambitions of their leaders. The revolution's legacy, marked by suffering and loss, serves as a cautionary tale about the destructive potential of power struggles disguised as ideological battles. Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution was not merely a chapter in Chinese history but a profound illustration of how political ambition can overshadow principles, leaving a trail of devastation in its wake.

The writer is an undergrad student, Department of International Relations, University of Dhaka


LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
This is right time to dismantle RAB
Beware of fireworks on the eve of new year 
Peace in Myanmar, region depends on lasting solution to Rohingya issue
What to do for physical and mental health 
Goodbye 2024: A year marked by new escalated conflicts
Accountability is a must-but how?
Comrade Moni Singh: A legend of sacrifice in politics
A better tomorrow with the awakening of 2024
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: district@dailyobserverbd.com, news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝
close