Saturday | 11 January 2025 | Reg No- 06
বাংলা
   
Saturday | 11 January 2025 | Epaper

Is a UN Security Council resolution key to Syria's future?

Published : Wednesday, 25 December, 2024 at 12:00 AM  Count : 319
Deutsche Welle
Resolution 2254, agreed upon by the UN Security Council in 2015, outlined how the Syrian civil war might end and how the country could transition to democracy. But is it still fit for purpose now so much has changed?

As the situation in Syria continues to evolve following the ouster of President Bashar Assad, an almost decade-old UN Security Council resolution is being described as vital for what comes next.

"The people of Syria stand at a moment of history - and a moment of opportunity. That opportunity cannot be missed," United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said last week in New York. "The process must be guided by the underlying principles of Security Council Resolution 2254." Many senior international diplomats, including the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, have said similar.

The Security Council, or UNSC, released a statement last week that also agreed with this statement, even though the body has been divided over issues pertaining to Syria. Russia, one of the council's permanent members, is a long-standing ally of the Assad regime and became involved in the war on his behalf in 2015. Russia has vetoed or interfered in UNSC measures around Syria many times throughout the conflict, including blocking aid deliveries and vetoing an investigation into the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime.

However, now that the Assad regime is gone, Russia is taking a more placatory attitude to UNSC work on Syria.

What is UNSC Resolution 2254?

The resolution was passed unanimously by members of the UN Security Council in 2015 as the Syrian civil war became increasingly brutal and bloody. It was intended as the basis of ceasefire talks. It advocates for a peaceful transition of power from dictatorship toward democracy. The Assad family had controlled Syria since 1971 and was known for violently suppressing any political dissent.After peaceful revolutions in 2011 during the so-called "Arab Spring," fighting broke out between the Syrian government, which tried to suppress the protests, and anti-government rebels.

According to Resolution 2254, any ceasefire should have included setting up a new, inclusive transitional government and drafting a new constitution. The ultimate aim was to ease Assad out of power and hold free and fair elections. The resolution said that this process should be Syrian-led but supported by the UN.

"The only sustainable solution to the current crisis in Syria is through an inclusive and Syrian-led political process that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people" was probably the most often quoted line from Resolution 2254 over the past decade of war. Resolution 2254 also committed to Syria's territorial integrity, national independence, societal unity and a non-sectarian system of governance.

As one commentator noted on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), "applying 2254 today feels like prescribing meds for a condition that no longer exists." Indeed, some of the details of the resolution are now outdated. For instance, it calls for negotiations and power sharing between the Syrian opposition and the Syrian government, headed by Assad. Obviously, that government no longer exists.

Syria's de-facto head of government, Ahmad al-Sharaa, head of the rebel militia that led the charge that toppled the Assad regime, has also raised this point. Al-Sharaa's "General Command," which is running the country during the current transition, broadly supports Resolution 2254, a statement from the organization said. But at this weekend's meeting with the UN's Special Envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, in Damascus, al-Sharaa also suggested that Resolution 2254 needed to be updated given new realities on the ground.

Despite criticisms of Resolution 2254, it still seems the most likely proposal to guide the Syrian transition. "It is easier for [UN Security] Council members to stick with the basic principles of 2254 than come up with an entirely new plan for a UN role in Syria," Richard Gowan, UN director at the Criss Group think tank told Abu Dhabi-based newspaper The National earlier in December.

The resolution could simply serve as a basis for a "Syrian-Syrian dialogue, with the participation of the full spectrum, including trustworthy individuals, technocrats, experts, patriots," Yahya al-Aridi, a university professor and former spokesperson for the Syrian opposition, told specialist publication Syria Direct last week.

To succeed, Syrian's transition "must be carried out by Syrians for Syrians, but with external assistance," Carl Bildt, Sweden's former prime minister and foreign minister, argued in a December op-ed for Project Syndicate. "The UN process represents the best way forward."


LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
This is right time to dismantle RAB
Beware of fireworks on the eve of new year 
Peace in Myanmar, region depends on lasting solution to Rohingya issue
What to do for physical and mental health 
Goodbye 2024: A year marked by new escalated conflicts
Accountability is a must-but how?
Comrade Moni Singh: A legend of sacrifice in politics
A better tomorrow with the awakening of 2024
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: district@dailyobserverbd.com, news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝
close