For years, the Bangladesh-Malaysia labour migration corridor has been marked by repeated openings, closures and broken promises. The partnership should have been a model of safe and dignified migration. Malaysia needs workers, while Bangladesh has people eager to earn a living and support their families. Yet, each reopening has brought fresh hope, followed by excessive recruitment fees, deception, joblessness and exploitation. Workers borrow money, sell land and mortgage family assets to secure overseas employment, only to return home burdened with debt and trauma. This is not merely an administrative failure; it is a recurring policy failure with devastating human consequences.
The history of this corridor offers a painful lesson. The market closed in 1997 amid serious irregularities and concerns over undocumented workers. It reopened around 2006-2007, but a broker-driven system exposed many workers to high recruitment costs, deception and joblessness. The market closed again around 2008-2009. In 2012, the government-to-government (G2G) arrangement promised to reduce intermediaries and migration costs. However, the system moved slowly and failed to meet the expectations of workers and employers. The subsequent G2G Plus arrangement brought further concerns about syndication and the concentration of recruitment in the hands of a limited number of agencies and business interests. By 2018, allegations of monopoly, excessive fees and exploitation had once again undermined confidence in the process, leading to another suspension.
After years of negotiations, the market reopened in 2022, raising hopes that the previous failures would not recur. Unfortunately, many workers again paid huge sums to secure jobs. Some arrived in Malaysia only to find that no proper employment awaited them. Others remained in poor accommodation, became undocumented through no fault of their own or returned home with mounting debt and psychological distress. The market closed again in 2024. Now, as Bangladesh and Malaysia discuss another memorandum of understanding (MoU), the central question is whether both countries will finally abandon a model that has repeatedly failed migrant workers.
Before signing another agreement, both governments must investigate what happened to workers who paid substantial fees but returned empty-handed, arrived without genuine jobs or became undocumented because recruiters and employers failed to fulfil their obligations.
We must make one point clear: labour migration to Malaysia should continue. Bangladeshi workers have contributed significantly to Malaysia’s plantations, factories, construction, services and other sectors. Their remittances also sustain families and communities back home. However, migration cannot be safe when workers begin their journeys in debt. It cannot be regular when employers’ demands remain unverified, nor can it be dignified when workers face passport confiscation, unpaid wages and ignored complaints. A system that leaves workers poorer than before cannot be considered successful.
The problem goes beyond illegal brokers. It lies in the political economy of recruitment, the influence of powerful business interests, opaque agency selection, questionable job demands and weak monitoring after workers arrive. Both sending and receiving countries must ensure accountability among employers, recruiting agencies, intermediaries and digital recruitment platform operators. Whenever the market closes, workers bear the greatest losses while agencies blame one another and governments resume negotiations. Families are left with debt, children face hardship and workers often remain silent because of shame, fear or pressure. Meanwhile, those who profited from the system may escape meaningful scrutiny.
Therefore, any new agreement must go beyond another weak MoU. Bangladesh and Malaysia should establish a legally binding Bilateral Labour Agreement with enforceable safeguards. The employer-pays principle must apply in practice, with a clear prohibition on recruitment fees charged to workers. Both governments should ensure transparency in agency selection, recruitment costs, employer demands, employment contracts and digital platforms. Employers, job offers, salaries and accommodation must be verified before departure. Joint monitoring must continue at workplaces after arrival, supported by accessible complaint mechanisms, effective remedies and the right to change employers in cases of abuse. Workers who become undocumented because of recruitment fraud or forced labour must also receive protection against unjust detention and deportation.
Equally important is justice for those already harmed. Before signing another agreement, both governments must investigate what happened to workers who paid substantial fees but returned empty-handed, arrived without genuine jobs or became undocumented because recruiters and employers failed to fulfil their obligations. Those responsible must face accountability, and affected workers must have access to compensation and effective remedies. A new agreement without justice for past victims will only create another generation of victims.
Responsible recruiting agencies, civil society organisations, trade unions, returnee workers and migrant rights groups must also work together to prevent syndicates and monopolies from capturing the market. Ethical agencies need a fair and transparent system in which no one can impose hidden costs, manipulate job demands or profit from workers’ recruitment debts. Publishing the proposed agreement, consulting stakeholders and establishing a credible monitoring mechanism would help ensure that reform works in practice rather than remaining on paper.
For too long, migrant workers have been treated as numbers, remittance senders and units of manpower export. They are human beings, fathers, mothers, sons, daughters and citizens who deserve respect, protection and justice. Bangladesh must not sign another agreement that repeats the failures of the past, and Malaysia must not recruit workers through a system that breeds debt bondage and exploitation. Both governments must demonstrate the political courage to break this cycle.
Migration should continue, but with dignity, rights and accountability. There must be no more opening and closing without accountability, no more syndicate-driven recruitment, no more debt-based migration and no more empty promises. The Bangladesh-Malaysia labour corridor must be rebuilt on fairness, transparency and human dignity. Anything less would amount to another betrayal of migrant workers.
The writer is a migrant rights activist