It
does not have a seat at the United Nations (UN). The overwhelming
majority of countries do not formally recognise it as a sovereign state.
Official maps show it as part of Somalia. Despite this inescapable
reality, in the past two years, Somaliland has considerably expanded its
global economic profile in trade, energy security, US-China
competition, West Asian geopolitics, African economic integration and
even the future of Taiwan’s international relationships. So, how can a
territory that does not exist as an independent state in the eyes of the
international community be garnering so much attention?
Much of
the answer to that question lies in Somaliland’s advantageous
geographical location, especially its stretch of coastline along the
Gulf of Aden that is directly adjacent to the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait. A
crucial maritime chokepoint that not only links the Red Sea to the
Indian Ocean but also serves as the southern gateway to the Suez Canal,
Bab-el-Mandeb sees substantial volumes of oil, liquefied natural gas
(LNG), manufactured goods and containerised trade pass through it as a
corridor connecting Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
Bab-el-Mandeb
represents a key artery of the global economy, and even more so in
recent years due in no small part to a regional shipping crisis
involving attacks by Yemen’s Ansar Allah (Houthis) on commercial vessels
bound for Israel, forcing many shipping companies to reroute traffic
around South Africa’s Cape of Good Hope. For investors, policymakers and
military planners alike, the episode has highlighted the dependence of
well-functioning global markets on a select number of critical maritime
corridors. Somaliland sits directly beside one of them, underscoring its
strategic geographical importance.
Somaliland’s economic
significance is also attributable to Berbera, a port located within the
territory on the Gulf of Aden. Underutilised for decades, Berbera is
fast becoming one of Africa’s most significant logistics projects,
especially since the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE’s) DP World invested
hundreds of millions of dollars to secure a 65-percent controlling stake
in the port’s development (the Somaliland government owns the remaining
35 percent). New container facilities, road links and logistics
projects are gradually transforming the port into a serious regional
trade hub.
With its facilitation of access to global markets,
therefore, Berbera could prove economically crucial to countries in the
region, none more so than Ethiopia. Ethiopia, Africa’s second-most
populous country with more than 120 million people, depends heavily on
neighbouring countries for maritime access, with most of the country’s
trade historically flowing through Djibouti.
The landlocked
country has endured high transport costs, diminished competitiveness and
considerable dependence on its neighbours-situations that have only
worsened in recent decades after it lost direct access to the sea
following Eritrea’s independence in the early 1990s. As Ethiopia’s
economy and population continue to expand, access to reliable trade
corridors becomes ever more essential.
Berbera offers a solution
to this need. If trade volumes continue to grow, the port could become a
major gateway that not only links Ethiopia to international markets but
also creates a raft of new commercial opportunities across the Horn of
Africa. It is perhaps through Berbera that Somaliland’s economic
significance is most clearly illuminated. Beyond simply creating local
jobs, infrastructure projects within the territory are restructuring
trade routes across one of the world’s most strategically important
regions.
That said, the investments have also transformed Berbera
into a distinct geopolitical flashpoint. Somalia’s federal government
has repeatedly objected to agreements involving Somaliland and foreign
partners, arguing that they undermine its sovereignty. Tensions with the
UAE, in particular, were inflamed after Israel officially recognised
Somaliland as an independent state in December 2025. “Somalia views this
as an infringement of its territorial integrity and believes the UAE
played a behind-the-scenes role in supporting the outcome,” according to
Omar Mahmood, a senior researcher at the International Crisis Group
think tank.
“The region is increasingly defined by divergent
geopolitical blocs, with the UAE and Israel on one side, and Saudi
Arabia, Turkey and others on the other,” Mahmood told the British
Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in January, adding that Somalia’s
relationship with the UAE had soured since the Gulf state’s ally,
Ethiopia, indicated in 2024 that it would recognise Somaliland’s
independence in return for establishing a naval base along the breakaway
state’s coast. “But Ethiopia only promised recognition. Israel went
ahead and did it, and that raises the stakes.”
As security
concerns in the region have increased, partnerships around the Red Sea
have taken on greater geopolitical significance. Despite operating its
own government, currency and institutions, Somaliland remains largely
excluded from many of the international systems that facilitate global
commerce, with businesses facing obstacles to accessing
correspondent-banking relationships, trade finance, insurance and
development funding. Recognition is, therefore, regarded as an economic
necessity for unlocking investment, integrating with global markets and
accelerating growth. It also explains in part why Israel-its trade links
with Asia being heavily dependent on maritime routes passing through
Bab-el-Mandeb-officially recognised Somaliland.
Perhaps the most
surprising aspect of Somaliland’s rise has been its growing relationship
with Taiwan. The two territories share an uncommon characteristic: Both
function as self-governing political entities while facing
international disputes over their status. In recent years, Somaliland
and Taiwan have established representative offices and expanded
cooperation in areas such as education, healthcare, technology and
development.
Given that China regards Taiwan as part of its
territory, the deepening Taiwan-Somaliland relations have prompted China
to expand its engagement with Somalia simultaneously. “Both sides
reaffirmed the strength of the China-Somalia strategic partnership and
their mutual support on core interests. They welcomed the positive
momentum in bilateral relations, agreed to deepen political trust and
practical cooperation, and underscored their shared commitment to
sovereignty, unity, and non-interference,” according to Beijing’s
readout of the phone call held in January between the foreign ministers
of China and Somalia. “China reiterated its firm support for Somalia’s
territorial integrity, stressing that Somaliland is an inalienable part
of Somalia, while Somalia reaffirmed its steadfast support for the
one-China principle and all of China’s efforts for national
reunification, and the authority of UNGA Resolution 2758.”
As
China’s influence expands across Africa through infrastructure
investment, trade and diplomatic engagement, the United States has
become increasingly focused on maintaining its own influence in the Horn
of Africa.
“The question of Somaliland remains particularly
sensitive. While some international actors like Israel and the UAE have
shown growing interest in the territory due to its relative stability
and strategic location near the Bab al-Mandeb, neighbouring states and
the African Union have traditionally favoured preserving Somalia’s
territorial integrity because they believe recognition of Somaliland
might catalyse secessionist movements in other countries,” the Atlantic
Council recently reported. “Regardless of the ultimate status question,
the US can deepen commercial engagement, maritime cooperation,
private-sector dialogue, and technical exchanges with Somaliland while
maintaining support for broader regional stability.”
Some of the
more virulent anti-China factions of the Republican Party have been keen
to advance the recognition of Somaliland. To “counter malign Chinese
activity” in Sub-Saharan Africa, the American right-wing think tank the
Heritage Foundation stated in its Project 2025 conservative policy
blueprint that US measures should include “the recognition of Somaliland
statehood as a hedge against the US’ deteriorating position in
Djibouti”. What’s more, a bill to “recognize Somaliland of the Federal
Republic of Somalia as a separate, independent country” was introduced
in December by U.S. Representative Scott Perry (R-PA), although it has
yet to pass the House of Representatives.
“Stronger US engagement
with Somaliland risks neglecting Somalia. Mogadishu depends on external
military assistance in its battle against the advancing violent
Islamist extremist group, Al-Shabaab. It also faces increasing defiance
from two federal regions, Puntland and Jubaland,” explained Aleksi
Ylönen, a professor at United States International University-Africa
(USIU) and researcher at the Center for International Studies,
ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon (CEI-IUL), in a May 2025 article
for The Conversation.
“US recognition would reward Hargeisa for
its persistent effort to maintain stability and promote democracy,”
Ylönen added. “However, it could encourage other nations to recognise
Somaliland. This would deliver a blow to Somali nationalists who want
one state for all Somalis.”
The question of recognition remains
unresolved for the time being. Most governments continue to support
Somalia’s territorial integrity and remain reluctant to establish a
precedent that might encourage other separatist movements. Yet
Somaliland’s position today differs markedly from where it stood a
decade ago.
Indeed, it is becoming increasingly clear that
recognition is no longer the only measure of significance. Somaliland is
increasingly becoming a meeting point between global trade, great-power
rivalry and regional economic transformation. For most of the world,
Somaliland remains an unrecognised state. For investors, policymakers
and geopolitical strategists, it is becoming much harder to ignore.