The demand for a Tk 30,000 minimum monthly wage by garment workers in Mirpur, Ashulia and Gazipur is more than just a figure on paper. It is a cry of frustration from the very workforce powering a multi-billion-dollar export industry. As the prices of food, rent and basic transport skyrocket, the people keeping this sector alive are finding it nearly impossible to survive on what they earn. The government’s decision to form a six-member minimum wage board is a welcome step towards correcting this imbalance, but its success hinges on one crucial factor: whether the board bases its recommendations on the real cost of living, or simply settles for what factory owners say they can spare.
For decades, Bangladesh’s ready-made garment sector has banked on cheap labour, sheer volume and global market access to stay ahead of competitors. This formula built an economic powerhouse, creating millions of jobs, especially for women, and bringing in vital foreign currency. Yet this momentum cannot last if workers are forced to absorb the crushing weight of inflation while the broader industry prospers. Underpaying workers does more than just push families into poverty; it triggers recurring labour unrest, shuts down production lines and chips away at the trust of international buyers. Seen in this light, paying a fair living wage isn’t just an added cost, it is an investment in the industry’s long-term survival.
That stability is already slipping, as recent protests have spiralled into violent clashes, vandalism and arson, forcing over 300 factories to shut their doors. Predictably, political accusations have flooded the airwaves, with police arrests and officials claiming anti-government groups are exploiting the chaos for their own agendas. These allegations certainly warrant fair and independent investigation, but we must be careful not to let political drama hijack the narrative. The state must clearly separate malicious agitators from everyday workers who are simply standing up for their basic livelihood, ensuring that genuine labour concerns aren’t brushed aside.
Getting factories reopened and maintaining law and order is an immediate necessity, but turning the machines back on won’t erase the deep-seated frustration driving these protests. That is why the newly formed wage board must ground its figures in real household expenses and current inflation rates. At the same time, the government needs to step up with targeted safety nets such as subsidised groceries, decent housing and accessible medical care in key industrial hubs. Crucially, factory owners and the BGMEA cannot carry this load alone; global brands, whose relentless pressure for lower prices stifles wage growth, must step up and share the financial responsibility for fair pay.
Ultimately, our garment industry has reached a crossroads where it must reinvent what makes it competitive. Relying on bottom-tier wages might shave off short-term costs, but it offers zero defence against future economic shocks. True resilience lies in modernising technology, upskilling workers and improving management so factories can compete on quality and efficiency rather than cheap labour. The goal right now shouldn’t just be calming the streets today. It must be building an industry where national economic success actually improves the daily lives of the people who make it happen.